Because the vast majority of offices and departments used the athletics logo for their own branding, I assumed adoption of the new logo and requests for unitmarks would be low and slow. No so! Plus, the applications of the unitmark ran counter to what I assumed, so the logo wasn’t designed with those applications in mind. We had to be willing to make exceptions and alterations that would allow those applications to work. I ended up adding marks for apparel specifically as well as informal applications, rather than have the community go rogue when the rules proved too strict.
“If you build it, they will come” may apply to a baseball field, but may not with new brand standards. A website replete with rules and tools, no matter how comprehensive or intentionally built, will not get the eyeballs you want. Were I to have done this project again, I would have offered more info sessions to actually present the tools and how to use them and to answer questions. Explanations for processes I took for granted—such as going from using a single lockup to using a modular logo system—would have benefited the community.
Successful rebrands stoke the appetite for more change. Though the athletics logo was originally not part of the project, we did open the door for an interim update to refresh the "Buzz" logo to improve readability. The process also benefitted an already-planned migration of the athletics website to Sidearm, where we optimized the opportunity to integrate some of the new college branding and draw visual linkages to athletics.